20 Evolutionist Logic Errors:1

	Duration: 09:33 minutes Upload Time: 2007-05-21 20:56:50 User: thevinerhyme :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: Jeff Mason "TheVineRhyme" shares 20 logic errors most evolutionist's use in dealing with oppositions to their views.
Comments
kagato89 ::: Favorites I found it interesting that this guy claimed evolution made great claims without providing "hard evidence". In fact, all his points against evolution did nothing to disprove evolution. Even if there were no "hard evidence" (which there is plenty of) it still does not disprove anything. Furthermore, creationists have no interest in evidence that does not support their beliefs. 07-10-08 23:07:34 __________________________________________________
hanzo138 ::: Favorites Actually we use the same reconstructive technique in murder cases where the only way to identify the individual is a skull. It is extremely accurate and in now way a guess. 07-10-05 15:22:45 __________________________________________________
gymnotropic ::: Favorites Very well said. 07-09-13 23:02:20 __________________________________________________
gymnotropic ::: Favorites First of all, you can be a hypocrite, but the material is able to be true. Second of all, I believe the "hard evidence" is the history portrayed in the Bible. Locations, dates, times, etc. Now, if you want to separate the Bible and the History in it, you are still left with the effects of Creation, and the effects of sin. Forgive me for any logical fallacies in the above paragraph, and please point them out. 07-09-13 22:57:06 __________________________________________________
dbviewer5 ::: Favorites Good video bro! 07-09-12 20:20:47 __________________________________________________
dbviewer5 ::: Favorites Where's your hard evidence for matter and energy coming into existence all by itself, abiogenesis, the THEORY of evolution, the finely tuned laws of the physical universe, and, the mathematical probability of any one of these things happening by chance? 07-09-12 20:19:03 __________________________________________________
myst931 ::: Favorites So then if great claims require "hard evidence"...might I play devil's advocate and ask WHERE YOUR HARD EVIDENCE IS FOR THERE BEING A SUPERNATURAL ENTITY THAT GOVERNS THE UNIVERSE AND THE EARTH ?. My advice is, be careful how you word things because you sound like a complete hypocrite sometimes. 07-09-11 23:49:11 __________________________________________________
TEEKAYELL ::: Favorites we have great claims but no hard evidence. u hav bad claims with no evidence at all 07-08-29 03:53:21 __________________________________________________
nunezger ::: Favorites good, dont be scientist ! 07-08-26 04:08:55 __________________________________________________
nunezger ::: Favorites DIFFERENTIATION (somewhat random), SELECTION (non-random), and AMPLIFICATION: that is the mechanism for evolution. That's the only reasonable way to explain all the complexity in the universe. 07-08-26 04:04:59 __________________________________________________