1 Million rounds per minute gun.

	Duration: 02:41 minutes Upload Time: 2006-08-18 17:45:31 User: nofreee :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day
Description: 1 Million rounds per minute gun.
Comments
alexman18 ::: Favorites this isn't a gun, and there would be no kick that's why it's on a tripod. these would never be available to civilians, the military would use them at their bases. 07-10-15 22:06:18 __________________________________________________
JamLeigh05 ::: Favorites how the fuck do you aim a gun like that, thats firing 1 million rounds per min... the kick would be un controlable. 07-10-07 19:25:03 __________________________________________________
TequilaKG ::: Favorites So let's take the idea that, that gun is aimed at you. Whether you are a criminal or not the machine will fire at YOU. Should we really be making guns like this. Can we afford to have this kind of technology. This only makes decisions less personal and more instant. Guns, they let cowards have a word in edge wise, when they shouldn't. 07-09-28 13:48:51 __________________________________________________
mike4ty4 ::: Favorites PS. Thanks for the very good series of comments about war and when it is or isn't needed. What do you think of opposing the war in Iraq, anyway? Even though you yourself take a neutral opinion on the subject, do you have a problem with all the opposition to the war? 07-09-27 15:14:25 __________________________________________________
mike4ty4 ::: Favorites (cont'd from last) Furthermore even if one misses the young years one can still change if they want to, if they're open enough (I'm open enough, for example, so I'd love to know my error, if any. I don't know about the guy you were talking to, though.). 07-09-27 15:12:59 __________________________________________________
mike4ty4 ::: Favorites "I'm not the one that's been talking out of my ass. Everyone has a sense of ego, but young kids who presume to know something without actually knowing it" But what happens if you want to actually learn the stuff, and don't want to talk out of your ass, like I do? (cont'd) 07-09-27 15:12:43 __________________________________________________
SANPH ::: Favorites I should add that the reason I and a lot of other politicians and citizens supported the initial invasion before the "bad intelligence" was revealed, was because Saddam was a known military aggressor - he invaded Kuwait and Iran. If he ever got to the point where he could have usable nuclear weapons, that would suck ass for his neighbors. 07-09-26 19:26:16 __________________________________________________
SANPH ::: Favorites Other people think he quickly had all evidence destroyed, because he knew he would lose the war and wanted to discredit the US. Both options are possible but are unprovable, just like the idea that he NEVER had them. He was a crafty son of bitch - you'd have to be to stay in power that long. I just want to get it over with and get to a point where Iraq can take care of themselves. 07-09-26 19:21:52 __________________________________________________
SANPH ::: Favorites I don't typically support "police action" wars, but we had bad intelligence before Iraq, and we can't really go back and fix that now. A lot of the people who supported the invasion before based on the WMD stuff have changed their opinion. I've changed to a neutral stance, because there's no proof either way that he did or didn't have them - a lot of people seem to think he transported them across the border in mobile labs when war looked imminent. 07-09-26 19:19:57 __________________________________________________
SANPH ::: Favorites The tone of your "question" was easily interpreted as rhetorical, accusatory, and sarcastic, especially given the context of the conversation it was asked in. So, I responded in kind. Be more careful of that. Also, since you seem to be demanding an answer, I only think war is necessary in response to an international crisis, such as in the World Wars. 07-09-26 19:15:28 __________________________________________________